The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday let stand a 200-year prison term for an Arizona man convicted of possessing 20 child pornography images, turning down his appeal arguing the sentence was excessive or cruel and unusual punishment.
View Voter TurnoutDiscuss It!
Serves him right, he shouldn't be looking at child pornography.
posted by: Jen1time Feb 26, 2007
That is one tough sentence. I think they hand out lighter sentences for rape. (Not that I would know or anything)
posted by: ambiguous81 Feb 26, 2007
I do think he should be punished, but that is cruel and unusual punishment.
posted by: Escobar Feb 27, 2007
I think he deserves to rot in jail. Children should not be show in a porograhic manner. It is deplorable!
posted by: suzieqt Apr 14, 2007
CHILDREN UNDER 10 HAVING SEX AND HE'S DOWNLOADING PICTURES OF IT?????? I rest my case.
posted by: falynne May 21, 2007
Please login or register.
RSS